Hello fans of evidence-based medicine and open data!
We've recently launched the public beta of OpenTrials, after announcing the start of work on the platform on February 10th, 2016.
We are very excited about OpenTrials, and its potential role as part of the ecosystem to change the way clinical trials are conducted and reported on.
In this post we'll look at the features that are available in the OpenTrials beta release, and what is in the pipeline on the road to a proper v1 release.
OpenTrials is designed as a modular platform, employing a set of loosely coupled components that handle distinct tasks from the collection of data from external sources, through to the exposing of data for consumption via the API or a UI.
In the announcement post for the platform, we presented two diagrams that describe the architecture of the platform, and the data model that OpenTrials employs. The design presented then has not significantly changed, and you can see those diagrams below for convenience.
What those diagrams do not reveal is the actual feature set exposed to users, so we'll highlight the major features here.
The API exposes several RESTful endpoints that allow querying the primary entities of the OpenTrials data model. This is particularly useful for creating applications that paginate through related data, or where the application has identifiers for particular objects and wants to query all information for those objects.
The API also exposes a search endpoint, which is backed by Elasticsearch. This allows for deep queries into the entire database, and does not necessarily require any knowledge of the data model, or the relations between entities, to yield useful results. We've found that, given the nature of the data itself, the search endpoint is the most useful endpoint for regular use.
The Explorer UI is the main portal into the OpenTrials data. It is based on a search-driven user experience, and once a user reaches a trial page, opens up further navigation into the related entities for that trial.
The explorer easily enables users to navigate back to the data sources used to populate the database, and notably features many prompts for user contributions to help enhance the database by either identifying errors or contributing new data.
We are very happy with the usability of the Explorer UI, and we hope you will be too.
The Query UI is a way to perform ad hoc SQL queries over the entire OpenTrials data warehouse, and then do interesting visualisations with the results of those queries.
We leverage the excellent Re:dash for this, and we've had great success in the lead up to the beta in using this to extract interesting insights out of the data.
The Crowdsourcing UI is a way to allow users to help us improve the OpenTrials database via an interactive process, either validating data matches that have been made, or by making new manual matches across different records in the database.
We leverage the excellent Crowdcrafting for this. At beta, we are launching with a preview of this feature by exposing a "task" to validate matches we've automatically made in processing clinical trial records.
There are many "behind the scenes" features related to what we call the "data warehouse". It is especially important to understand these if you plan on contributing code to OpenTrials. The major features to note here are what we call collectors and processors.
As the naming suggests, collectors are responsible for bring external data into the database, and processors work on that data for matching, cleaning, normalisation, and the generation of the public API database.
Of course, the code we are writing is all directed to a single purpose - building a centralised database for information related to clinical trials. To this end, the majority of the work done over the last 6-8 months has been around data collection and processing. Likewise, going forward, this is really the area on which most effort will be focused.
Our focus so far has been on building out the spine of the database using data from clinical trial registers. This data provides the essential information that we need to thread together additional data from a range of other sources.
We've also integrated a data donation related to schizophrenia from Cochrane, systematic review data from the UK Health Research Authority, references to clinical trials in academic literature from PubMed, and more.
For more information on the data in the OpenTrials database at present, read our introduction to the data.
In terms of the technical platform, we will not be adding many more features. We'll expand the crowd sourcing tasks available, to facilitate user contribution to the database, and we will open up some more specific API endpoints. Of course, there are always bugs and small enhancements to work on.
Most of the work remaining is closely tied to the data. In terms of data cleaning, entity normalisation, and record matching, we've barely touched the surface. We'll be particularly focused on this over the next 6 months, and this is a great area to contribute if you have some data wrangling and data science interest or expertise.
We'll also integrate a few more data sources. These are sources we've been working on over the last months, but are not yet at a stage to expose over the public API. Of note here are an integration with Epistemonikos, which is a rich source of quality systematic reviews, and OpenAIRE, which has an impressive text and data mining feature set that is helping us uncover more clinical trial references in academic publications.
As with all Open Knowledge International projects, we welcome and encourage contribution. For the technical work on OpenTrials, contributions can mean any or all of code, documentation, testing, etc. See OpenTrials on GitHub for all the repositories with interesting tasks to take up. You can also see all the different ways you can contribute here or email us on: [email protected].